The NFL’s progression toward extending its regular season from 17 to 18 games is more than just a whisper of speculation; it’s becoming a strategic consideration in player contracts, setting a new precedent in the league. The latest contract of Myles Garrett with the Cleveland Browns is a prime example of how teams are proactively adapting to this likely change.
Browns Take Proactive Step with Garrett’s Contract
In a groundbreaking move, the Browns have included specific terms in Myles Garrett’s contract to accommodate an expanded NFL regular season. This forward-thinking approach not only highlights the inevitability of the league’s expansion but also underscores the financial adjustments players and teams must consider.
According to documents reviewed by PFT, Garrett’s contract, on its seventh page, clarifies how his per-game roster bonuses would adapt to an increased number of games. Should the season extend to 18 games, the agreement details that Garrett would earn approximately $55,555.55 per game, dividing a total potential bonus of up to $1 million by the season’s total games.
Anticipating Changes Beyond the Game Schedule
The contract doesn’t stop at just adjusting financial terms based on the number of games; it also considers potential changes in the roster sizes on game days. The agreement specifies that any modifications to the active list—the roster of players eligible to participate in games—will influence whether bonuses are disbursed per game, further safeguarding Garrett’s earnings and obligations.
This clause not only prepares Garrett financially but also ensures he remains a pivotal part of the team dynamics, regardless of how the league’s structural changes unfold.
A Strategic Shift in NFL Contract Negotiations
This isn’t the first instance of the Browns preparing for an 18-game season. Last year, the team proposed adjusting the trade deadline to better align with the expanded season—a suggestion that led to the adoption of a one-week delay by the owners.
The conversation around adding another game to the NFL schedule isn’t new, but the level of preparation seen in contracts like Garrett’s indicates a shift from hypothetical discussion to tangible, strategic planning. It reflects a broader anticipation of how the league’s economic and operational dynamics might evolve, emphasizing the need for flexibility in player contracts.
Looking Ahead: NFL and Players Association’s Next Moves
As the NFL and the NFL Players Association edge closer to the expiration of the current Collective Bargaining Agreement, the question remains: will they strike a deal favorable to both before a potential lockout? The adjustments seen in Garrett’s contract might soon become the norm as both sides prepare for the financial and logistical implications of a longer season.
This proactive approach by the Browns could serve as a model for other teams, ensuring that player agreements are as dynamic and adaptable as the league itself. As the NFL continues to evolve, so too must the strategies that teams and players employ to navigate its changing landscape.